OnePlus 13R 评测

分类: 365bet开户官网 发布时间: 2025-08-27 17:36:12
作者: admin 阅读: 6238 | 点赞: 665
OnePlus 13R 评测

OnePlus 13R 评测--续航能力惊人、差异惊人的智能手机还能接受多少节流? 在 OnePlus 13R 上,现实和一厢情愿有时会有些背离。虽然制造商宣传其顶级手机具有 "顶级性能",但在我们的测试中却无法证实这一点。尽管如此,OnePlus 13 的小兄弟还是提供了许多值得购买的积极方面。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/09/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

对 OnePlus 13R 的评价OnePlus 13R 拥有高品质的外观和令人印象深刻的续航能力。它结合了去年的旗舰 SoC、出色的扬声器和漂亮的 LTPO 面板,使 OnePlus 智能手机成为完美的日常伴侣。

Test device courtesy of OnePlus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

然而,这家中国制造商的 R 机型缺少一些高端功能,而这些功能已逐渐成为当今高端智能手机的标准配置。例如,它的 USB 2.0 端口并不能提供该价位手机的最高性能,也不支持无线充电或 eSIM 集成。当许多竞争对手都提供防水保护壳时,OnePlus 13R 的 IP65 等级对于一些潜在买家来说可能是一个决定性的不利因素。

OnePlus 13R 的一大弱点是余热过高,这导致处理器在这款顶级手机中的运行速度明显下降。在峰值时性能降低近三分之二,不仅对我们的整体评分产生了负面影响,而且在日常高强度使用(如长时间游戏或图形要求较高的任务)时也会导致性能波动。

Pros+ 明亮的 OLED 面板

+ 运行时间长

+ 高质量外壳

+ 性能卓越Cons- ...有相当大的节流

- 只有 USB 2.0

- 不支持 eSIM 卡

- 显示屏亮度有差异

价格和供应情况OnePlus 13R 售价 599.99 美元,可直接从制造商的在线商店订购。.

可能的替代品比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay

1.82.9%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $9.98JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...2. $7.99Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...3. $9.99[2+2 Pack] for OnePlus 13R S...List Price: 749€206 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2780x1264450 PPIAMOLED

2.85.4%OnePlus 12R 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB List Price: 499 EUR207 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2780x1264450 PPIAMOLED

3.83.4%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $8.99Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S...2. $6.95Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...3. $10.79Ibywind Screen Protector For...195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220446 PPIAMOLED

4.80.5%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $10.79Ibywind Screen Protector For...2. $24.99TUDIA DualShield Grip Compat...3. $10.45for Honor 200 Pro Screen Pro...List Price: 800€199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2700x1224437 PPIOLED

5.85.7%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB Amazon: 1. $7.99Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...2. $7.193 Pack Glass Screen Protecto...3. $6.94amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2340x1080385 PPIAMOLED

6.87.6%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $11.98uShield 2+2 Pack Screen Prot...2. $13.98[2+2 Pack] for OnePlus 13 Sc...3. $12.58JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...List Price: 720€213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440510 PPIAMOLED

Table of Contents对 OnePlus 13R 的评价OnePlus 13R 的规格 手机壳 - IP 等级的 OnePlus 手机连接性 - OnePlus 手机仅配备 USB 2.0软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 13R通信和全球导航卫星系统 - OnePlus 智能手机支持双 GPS电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 手机摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 OnePlus 13R配件和保修 - OnePlus 手机不含电源供应器输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的 OnePlus 手机显示屏 - OnePlus 13R 采用 LTPO 面板性能 - OnePlus 智能手机配备高通 SoC 芯片游戏 - OnePlus 13R 实现了 120fps 的速度排放 - OnePlus 手机被节流电池续航时间 - OnePlus 13R 充电速度非常快Notebookcheck 总评分

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

OnePlus 13R 采用了与中国制造商旗舰产品 OnePlus 13R 相似的概念。 一加 13.价格更实惠的 13R 机型旨在以其人工智能、高性能和特别大的 6000 毫安时电池给人留下深刻印象。OnePlus 13R 安装的 OLED 显示屏与更昂贵的旗舰机型几乎相同,因为它采用了一块 6.78 英寸、120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板,HDR 峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特。

这款顶级 OnePlus 手机以王牌 5 的名义在中国发布,目前只在美国推出了配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 内部存储空间的版本。在本次评测中,我们将揭晓 OnePlus 13 还有哪些不同之处。

OnePlus 13R 的规格

OnePlus 13R (13 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 750Memory12 GB , LPDDR5XDisplay6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Aqua Touch 2.0, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 219 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G: 850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz; 3G:1/2/4/5/6/8/19 4G:1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/66/71; 38/39/40/41/48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.02 x 161.72 x 75.77Battery6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-carbon anodeChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm, tele) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 16 mm, ultra wide), camera2 API: Level 3Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 26 mm)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, OxygenOS 15, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptx, aptx-HD, LDAC, LHDC (5.0), GNSS: Beidou (B1I+B1C+B2a), GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), Galileo (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5); HDR: Dolby Vision HLG, HDR10+, HDR10; SAR: 0,95 W/kg (head), 1,24 W/kg (body), fanlessWeight206 g

Price749 EuroLinksOnePlus homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

手机壳 - IP 等级的 OnePlus 手机OnePlus 13R 的颜色OnePlus 13R 的外壳质量上乘,做工精美。不过,鉴于其棱角分明的设计,它的握持感可能会更符合人体工程学。这款高档手机有两种颜色可供选择,一种是黑色,背面为磨砂玻璃;另一种是灰色,表面略带纹理。两种颜色都不会留下指纹。

一个小缺点是大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护着它的 6.78 英寸显示屏。与大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 等最新一代产品相比,这种由硅酸铝锂制成的中档玻璃材料在抗摔性方面有些落后。与 OnePlus 13 相比,通过 IP65 认证的外壳缺乏防尘和防水功能是另一个缺点。 一加 13.

即便如此,其 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框还是非常窄,给 R 机型带来了非常现代的外观。因此,屏幕与机身正面的尺寸比例达到了 91.2%。OnePlus 13R 还具有 OnePlus 智能手机特有的警报滑动按钮,可用于通知静音。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

尺寸比较

Honor 200 Pro OnePlus 13 Samsung Galaxy S24 FE OnePlus 13R Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Xiaomi 14T DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - OnePlus 手机仅配备 USB 2.0相比之下 旗舰相比,R 机型只有一个 USB 2.0 端口。在使用连接的 M2 SSD 硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行复制测试时,我们测得的传输速度仅为 40 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。不支持通过端口进行有线图像输出。

除此之外,这款 OnePlus 高端手机还配备了现代蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器、Miracast 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 功能。

机箱左侧(警报滑块)

机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)

机箱底部侧面(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽)

机箱顶侧(红外热像仪、麦克风)

软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 13ROnePlus 13R 搭载了该公司自己的 OxygenOS,它基于最新的Android 15。在测试时,安全补丁相当及时,即从 2025 年 1 月开始。根据 OnePlus 的说法,与安全相关的更新将持续 6 年,但 R 机型将提前两年(即 2029 年)收到最后一次 "重要 "Android 更新。这没有问题,但三星或 谷歌在这方面做得还是更持久一些。

除了 Circle to Search 和谷歌的 Gemini 之外,OnePlus 还在其 Oxygen 界面中加入了更多人工智能功能。其中包括 AI 笔记、自带人工智能的智能设备搜索(名为 OnePlus AI)以及基于 AI 的照片和视频编辑。

可持续性OnePlus 没有提供任何有关所用材料或其回收率的准确信息。13R 的包装似乎不使用塑料,但设备本身在运输过程中使用了一层薄膜保护--可能由可堆肥的生物塑料制成。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - OnePlus 智能手机支持双 GPSOnePlus 13R 不仅支持现代 "be "标准 WiFi 7,还支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。不过,在我们的测试中,这款高端手机在与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的配合中表现出了一些弱点。它在 6 GHz WLAN 中的接收数据速度并不快,而且我们使用高通公司的 FastConnect 7800 调制解调器测量的发送数据速率也不太稳定。

OnePlus 13R 最多只能通过 5G 标准访问移动数据网络,并支持多种频率。它在 4G 网络中的频段支持也非常好,与本次测试地德国相关的所有频率都可用。此外,这款高端手机还拥有 25 个 LTE 频段,可在德国以外的地区使用。

NetworkingOnePlus 13RWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼29%

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000

812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼80%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼85%

Xiaomi 14TWi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000

970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼100%

Honor 200 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000

944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼93%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼82%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FEWi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000

976 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

723 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼71%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1844 (min: 1768) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1513 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼97%

OnePlus 13Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼81%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼78%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼97%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼94%

Average Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1015 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1014 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1534 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1522 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼98%

Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000

722 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

734 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼72%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1364 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1398 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼90%

OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (176-1725) OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1704-1904) OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø450 (397-487) OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1437 (769-1573) OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø957 (927-998) OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (704-911) OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø749 (726-766) OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (705-871)

户外定位服务

室内定位服务在我们的测试中,OnePlus 智能手机在定位功能方面没有表现出任何弱点。室外和室内的精确定位、双 GNSS 支持以及实际测试中良好的路线一致性都对 13R 有利。不过,我们也注意到了一些距离上的小偏差,尤其是在改变方向时。即便如此,作为对比使用的 Garmin Venu 2 的整体路线表现也不相上下,因此即使是要求苛刻的导航任务,我们也可以毫不犹豫地推荐 OnePlus 13R。

OnePus 13R 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 手机

OnePlus 13R 的通话质量非常令人满意。在通话过程中,这款高端智能手机的语音传输清晰自然。不过,在嘈杂的环境中,耳机的音量可能会稍大一些。

该手机采用了成熟的双卡双待设置,有两个卡槽。在美国,买家可以选择在系统中集成 eSIM 卡。这在欧洲并不适用。您还可以使用 VoWiFi 和 VoLTE 等功能。

摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 OnePlus 13ROnePlus 13R 上的自拍照OnePlus 13R 的前置摄像头像素为 1600 万,采用固定对焦,最多只能录制 1080p 的视频。不过,使用该镜头拍摄的照片色彩靓丽、清晰度高。不过,细节的呈现还可以更好一些。

索尼 LYT-700 是该机的核心摄像头,分辨率为 50 万像素,支持 OIS。传感器尺寸为 1/1.56 英寸,虽然不是最大的,但在日光下仍能拍摄出非常出色的照片。但在暗处,照片看起来会越来越模糊,曝光效果也可能会更好。

0.6x1x2x5x10x20 倍(最大值)分辨率仅为 800 万像素的超广角镜头的质量却差强人意。它的图像清晰度明显下降,尤其是在边缘,而且会出现畸变。该组中的第三个摄像头采用了三星 ISOCELL JN5,分辨率为 50MPix,可无损放大 2 倍拍摄照片。放大 5 倍的照片细节丰富,模糊程度相对较低。

OnePlus 13R 可录制最高 4K60 的视频。即使使用 5000 万像素的主摄像头,也无法拍摄 8K 视频。镜头之间的切换只能在 1080p 视频中进行。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow lightZoom 5xUltra-wide angleclick to load imagesOnePlus 13RHonor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 13RHonor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 13RHonor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 13RHonor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 13RHonor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

在受控照明条件下,我们将索尼主镜头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。在描述 ColorChecker Passport 时,50-MPix 镜头显示绿色色调变亮和轻微过饱和。不过,OnePlus 13R 在色彩保真度方面没有表现出任何异常(>10)。总的来说,这款高端手机的校准效果对于智能手机来说非常好。

3.4 ∆E1.8 ∆E6.8 ∆E8 ∆E2.1 ∆E3.7 ∆E2.9 ∆E5.8 ∆E5.3 ∆E4.4 ∆E4.5 ∆E5.7 ∆E5.4 ∆E6.9 ∆E4.6 ∆E5.3 ∆E3.7 ∆E6.6 ∆E7.2 ∆E3.7 ∆E2.6 ∆E0 ∆E4 ∆E7.3 ∆EColorChecker OnePlus 13R: 4.65 ∆E min: 0 - max: 7.97 ∆E29.6 ∆E53.5 ∆E38.9 ∆E34.8 ∆E44.4 ∆E61.2 ∆E52.1 ∆E34.7 ∆E41.9 ∆E29 ∆E63.9 ∆E63 ∆E30.3 ∆E47.2 ∆E36.1 ∆E74.5 ∆E42.3 ∆E41.3 ∆E86.9 ∆E69.8 ∆E51.5 ∆E36.4 ∆E23.8 ∆E13.3 ∆EColorChecker OnePlus 13R: 45.86 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 86.94 ∆E

OnePlus 13ROnePlus 13R

配件和保修 - OnePlus 手机不含电源供应器OnePlus 13R 的配套电源(图片:OnePlus)OnePlus 13R 随附数据线和充电线、SIM 卡针和包含保修信息的快速入门指南。开箱时还直接安装了保护膜。不过,该手机在欧盟并不附带模块化 80 瓦电源或保护盖。不过,如果通过制造商的在线商店购买,将免费获得 SUPERVOOC 充电器。

在美国,该设备享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的 OnePlus 手机OnePlus 13R 的显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器,虽然工作可靠,但其质量无法与它的超声波传感器相提并论。 大哥.此外,它的位置太靠屏幕底部,不符合我们的口味。您还可以使用可靠性稍差的 2D 面部识别功能,该功能基于使用前置摄像头的 FaceUnlock(面部解锁)功能。不过,在光线不足的情况下,这个功能并不总能可靠地工作。

除此之外,OnePlus 13R 配有 6.78 英寸 120 Hz OLED 面板,在日常使用中反应灵敏,操作流畅。输入时,线性振动电机(X 轴)可提供清晰的反馈。在日常使用中,特别是在寒冷的季节,它的另一个优势是支持厚度达 5 毫米的天然纤维手套输入。在我们的测试中,较厚的聚酯手套也能正常使用。

显示屏 - OnePlus 13R 采用 LTPO 面板OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。这款手机的 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 1264p,像素密度高达 450 PPI,采用 LTPO 技术,可在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。PWM 调制用于控制屏幕亮度,而屏幕亮度通常会通过屏幕闪烁来显示。值得庆幸的是,我们用示波器测得的频率高达 2,000 Hz 左右,这意味着视觉上可感知的亮度波动应该不会影响眼睛--即使是敏感的用户。

根据其数据表,OnePlus 13R 的面板峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特,但我们在测试过程中的任何测量都没有达到这一数值。虽然我们在使用 APL18 模式时能够达到 1,262 cd/m² 的亮度,但在播放 4K 视频材料时,亮度却下降到了 1,086 cd/m²。这意味着 HDR 内容是可以察觉到的,但如果使用小米 14T Pro,效果会更好。 小米 14T Pro(4,407 cd/m²)的效果要好得多。

1215cd/m²1217cd/m²1184cd/m²1213cd/m²1213cd/m²1192cd/m²1215cd/m²1218cd/m²1190cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1218 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1206.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 1213 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.22CCT: 6546 K

OnePlus 13RAMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Xiaomi 14TAMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Honor 200 ProOLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"Samsung Galaxy S24 FEAMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"OnePlus 13AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"Screen-2%7%11%-9%2%Brightness middle12131034 -15%1012 -17%1208 0%1211 0%1155 -5%Brightness12061035 -14%1016 -16%1194 -1%1214 1%1155 -4%Brightness Distribution9796 -1%95 -2%98 1%99 2%98 1%Black Level *Colorchecker dE 2000 *11.1 -10%0.7 30%0.9 10%1.6 -60%1 -0%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.31.9 17%1.8 22%1.4 39%2.4 -4%1.8 22%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.61.4 12%1.2 25%1.3 19%1.5 6%1.6 -0%Gamma2.22 99%2.22 99%2.19 100%2.29 96%2.13 103%2.3 96%CCT6546 99%6674 97%6489 100%6413 101%6456 101%6503 100%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 HzAmplitude: 14.15 %Secondary Frequency: 2000 HzThe display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

分钟

25 %

50 %

75 %

100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

OxgenOS 在显示设置中提供了多种自定义选项。您可以从四个色彩配置文件中进行选择,并调整 OLED 面板的白平衡。使用 "自然 "配置文件,我们通过控制 sRGB 色彩空间实现了最精确的校准。灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 值都很低,与参考数据几乎没有明显差异。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.659 ms rise↘ 0.6405 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey3.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.706 ms rise↘ 1.913 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

这款顶级手机在户外表现非常出色。即使在阳光充足、玻璃表面反光的情况下,内容依然清晰易读。不过,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备有限,"只有 "1,250 cd/m²,而竞争对手往往亮度极高。 亮度相比,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备 "仅 "为 1,250 cd/m²。值得注意的是,在未激活环境光传感器的情况下,其最大亮度仅为 816 cd/m²。

OnePlus 13R 的可视角度长时间保持稳定,只有从非常平的角度观看时面板才会明显变暗。

性能 - OnePlus 智能手机配备高通 SoC 芯片虽然 骁龙 8 代 3已不再是高通公司 旗舰 SoC但去年的芯片组仍然非常强大。在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中,这款配备 12GB DDR5X 内存的顶级手机表现非常出色。不过,它在 PCMark 和 CrossMark 系统测试中的数值却相当低。即使是 骁龙 8s Gen 3在 Honor 200 Pro也比 OnePlus 13R 做得更好。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.4

Single-CoreOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

3087 Points +39%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

2214 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (954 - 2329, n=27)

2116 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

2066 Points -7%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1821 Points -18%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=207, last 2 years)

1651 Points -25%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1440 Points -35%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1424 Points -36% Multi-CoreOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

9369 Points +42%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

6605 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4564 - 7501, n=27)

6600 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

6341 Points -4%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=207, last 2 years)

4795 Points -27%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

4602 Points -30%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4547 Points -31%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4423 Points -33%Geekbench 5.5

Single-CoreOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2192 Points +33%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1343 - 1702, n=17)

1651 Points 0%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1647 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

1581 Points -4%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1413 Points -14%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2437, n=147, last 2 years)

1161 Points -30%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1090 Points -34%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1085 Points -34% Multi-CoreOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

6789 Points +24%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 - 6543, n=17)

6007 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

5622 Points +3%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

5474 Points Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4279 Points -22%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

4188 Points -23%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

4155 Points -24%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=147, last 2 years)

3962 Points -28%Antutu v10 - Total Score

OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2762122 Points +56%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1390723 - 2162423, n=22)

1920710 Points +8%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1772142 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

1516996 Points -14%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1465265 Points -17%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1399064 Points -21%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)

1356630 Points -23%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1329696 Points -25%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

19793 Points +51%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (12156 - 25683, n=26)

17808 Points +36%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

17338 Points +33%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

16008 Points +22%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

14751 Points +13%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

14716 Points +12%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)

14387 Points +10%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

13085 Points CrossMark - Overall

OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2485 Points +129%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

1263 Points +17%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (951 - 1474, n=18)

1236 Points +14%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1112 Points +3%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1083 Points Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=140, last 2 years)

1062 Points -2%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

987 Points -9%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

946 Points -13%BaseMark OS II

OverallOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

10937 Points +18%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8088 - 10966, n=20)

9839 Points +6%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

9273 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

8827 Points -5%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

8433 Points -9%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

8039 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=149, last 2 years)

7186 Points -23%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

7122 Points -23% SystemSamsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

14627 Points +16%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

14039 Points +11%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8611 - 16015, n=20)

13713 Points +9%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

12637 Points Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

12177 Points -4%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

11587 Points -8%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

11299 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=149, last 2 years)

10939 Points -13% MemoryOnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

12087 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

11536 Points -5%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (7426 - 12716, n=20)

10692 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

9036 Points -25%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

8722 Points -28%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=149, last 2 years)

8126 Points -33%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

7784 Points -36%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

7735 Points -36% GraphicsOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

43637 Points +57%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (26972 - 39727, n=20)

33396 Points +20%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

29006 Points +4%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

27837 Points Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

27809 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)

23480 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

23338 Points -16%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

16594 Points -40% WebOnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

2091 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

1982 Points +12%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1661 - 2145, n=20)

1948 Points +10%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1763 Points Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1734 Points -2%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1676 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=149, last 2 years)

1646 Points -7%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

1636 Points -7%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

64597 Points +376%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

57997 Points +328%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

22767 Points +68%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=140, last 2 years)

19227 Points +42%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (11487 - 18370, n=20)

16229 Points +20%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

13576 Points 0%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

13564 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

11738 Points -13%AImark - Score v3.x

OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

231543 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (963 - 245629, n=17)

97396 Points -58%Xiaomi 14TMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

38828 Points -83%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288

33858 Points -85%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)

26880 Points -88%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

1982 Points -99%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

1173 Points -99%Honor 200 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1122 Points -100%Geekbench AI

Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)

1868 Points +259%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

1375 Points +164%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (483 - 3667, n=7)

1209 Points +132%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

521 Points Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)

1148 Points +413%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

654 Points +192%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (219 - 2460, n=7)

653 Points +192%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

224 Points Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

689 Points +193%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (235 - 2472, n=7)

662 Points +182%Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)

508 Points +116%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

235 Points AI Benchmark - Score V6

OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

7987 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5170 - 9552, n=5)

7271 Points -9%Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=58, last 2 years)

4298 Points -46%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384

734 Points -91%Samsung Galaxy S24 FESamsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192

598 Points -93%

安装的 Adreno 750是一款功能强大的 GPU,它没有理由躲避高端竞争产品--恰恰相反。在 GFXBench 测试中,我们注意到 OnePlus 13R 和三星 S24 FEi 之间的差距约为 30%。 三星Galaxy S24 FE的 Xclipse 940.不过,13R 的屏幕数值限制在 60fps 令人惊讶。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

6789 Points +40%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4854 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4378 Points -10%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3153 Points -35%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3085 Points -36%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3076 Points -37%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

6754 Points +38%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4891 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4329 Points -11%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3079 Points -37%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3068 Points -37%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3056 Points -38%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

25785 Points +35%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

19048 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

13847 Points -27%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

12004 Points -37%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11204 Points -41%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11001 Points -42%3DMark / Wild Life Score

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Points Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Points 3DMark / Solar Bay Score

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11821 Points +41%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

8398 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7948 Points -5%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5177 Points -38%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4953 Points -41%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11879 Points +42%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

8364 Points Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7894 Points -6%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5183 Points -38%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5145 Points -38%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2567 Points +50%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1803 Points +6%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1706 Points Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1065 Points -38%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1036 Points -39%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2599 Points +59%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1821 Points +11%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1636 Points Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1221 Points -25%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1055 Points -36%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

120 fps +100%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

768 fps +41%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

545 fps Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

462 fps -15%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

455 fps -17%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

454 fps -17%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

384 fps -30%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

120 fps +100%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

502 fps +30%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

387 fps Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

270 fps -30%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

269 fps -30%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

214 fps -45%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

185 fps -52%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

120 fps +100%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

117 fps +95%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

116 fps +93%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

365 fps +37%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

266 fps Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

215 fps -19%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

171 fps -36%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

170 fps -36%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

156 fps -41%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

103 fps +72%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

82 fps +37%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

81 fps +35%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

214 fps +35%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

159 fps Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

130 fps -18%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

110 fps -31%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

109 fps -31%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

99 fps -38%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

100 fps +67%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66 fps +10%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66 fps +10%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

51 fps -15%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

115 fps +31%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

89 fps +1%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

88 fps Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

53 fps -40%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

52 fps -41%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

44 fps -50%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

117 fps +95%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

93 fps +55%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

91 fps +52%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps 0%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

321 fps +44%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

223 fps Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

154 fps -31%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

135 fps -39%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

133 fps -40%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

111 fps -50%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

52 fps +27%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

41 fps Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

30 fps -27%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

24 fps -41%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

24 fps -41%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

20 fps -51%

在日常使用中,OnePlus 13R 浏览器的速度完全没有问题;在 OnePlus 13R 上打开网站的速度很快,滚动浏览也很流畅。相比之下,OnePlus 手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩相当弱,无论我们使用的是谷歌 Chrome 浏览器还是微软 Edge 浏览器。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score

OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)

238.78 Points +107%Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)

182.387 Points +58%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=24)

156.7 Points +36%Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)

146.3 Points +27%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

134.031 Points +16%OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)

115.454 Points Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)

70.555 Points -39%Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)

59.665 Points -48%Speedometer 3.0 - Score

OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)

31.6 runs/min +257%Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)

16 runs/min +81%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=108, last 2 years)

12.9 runs/min +46%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 18.9, n=14)

12.6 runs/min +42%OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)

8.86 runs/min Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)

6.62 runs/min -25%Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)

3.54 runs/min -60%WebXPRT 4 - Overall

OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)

235 Points +73%Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)

187 Points +38%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=20)

158.7 Points +17%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

140 Points +3%OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)

136 Points Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=147, last 2 years)

135.1 Points -1%Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)

103 Points -24%Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)

61 Points -55%Octane V2 - Total Score

OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)

92054 Points +121%Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)

64838 Points +55%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=25)

52566 Points +26%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

46286 Points +11%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)

45641 Points +9%OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)

41734 Points Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)

35853 Points -14%Honor 200 Pro

28536 Points -32%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)

1899.3 ms * -89%Honor 200 Pro

1456.4 ms * -45%Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)

1252 ms * -25%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)

1007.2 ms * -0%OnePlus 13R (Edge 133)

1002.6 ms * OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)

972.4 ms * +3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=23)

822 ms * +18%Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)

598.12 ms * +40%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)

432.7 ms * +57%* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 13R 在存储连接方面拥有很高的价值。这款采用 UFS 4.0 标准的高端手机在我们的测试中提供了非常出色的读写速度,尤其是在处理小数据块时。

OnePlus 13RXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GXiaomi 14THonor 200 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 FEOnePlus 13Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-2%-2%-42%-57%-10%-12%-37% Sequential Read 256KB3987.443824.7 -4%3605.16 -10%1992.32 -50%1783.43 -55%3984.23 0%3731 ?(3249 - 4384, n=42) -6%2210 ?(270 - 4370, n=190, last 2 years) -45% Sequential Write 256KB3201.323642.57 14%3294.31 3%1644.98 -49%631.23 -80%3684.36 15%2733 ?(555 - 3484, n=42) -15%1808 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=190, last 2 years) -44% Random Read 4KB374.54355.7 -5%403.97 8%276.23 -26%312.98 -16%301.29 -20%383 ?(218 - 483, n=42) 2%296 ?(47.6 - 504, n=190, last 2 years) -21% Random Write 4KB542.13467.74 -14%493.57 -9%321.09 -41%127.53 -76%344.63 -36%397 ?(51.2 - 730, n=42) -27%340 ?(9.4 - 964, n=190, last 2 years) -37%

游戏 - OnePlus 13R 实现了 120fps 的速度在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中,OnePlus 手机未能达到 60 帧/秒大关,我们认为它不会给我们带来真正的游戏惊喜。然而,我们记录到的帧率却让我们大吃一惊。使用GameBench 应用程序来看看 120 Hz 面板每秒能显示多少帧。

根据制造商的说法,R 机型使用内部 CPU 调度器来提高 骁龙 8 代 3在游戏过程中的效率。因此,它在运行《源氏冲击》时的功耗降低了 3%,这反过来又减少了发热量,还能确保更稳定的帧率。在高细节的情况下,我们最初测得这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏的平均帧数为 58fps(目前在Android 上还无法达到每秒 60 帧以上)。但大约 10 分钟后,由于散热过高,帧速率明显下降,低于 50fps 的临界值。在 20 分钟的测量过程中,OnePlus 13R 稳定在 44 到 47fps 左右。

在运行《PUBG Mobile》时,我们可以在低图形设置下使用面板的 120 Hz 刷新率。然而,在中等细节(高清模式)下,OnePlus 13R 只能达到典型的 60 帧/秒,而当我们在测试过程中提高图形细节(UHD)时,Adreno 图形单元则能稳定地达到 40 帧/秒。

源泉冲击

PUBG Mobile

OnePlus 13R; Genshin Impact: Ø52.1 (45-61) OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.6 (113-121) OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (56-61) OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放 - OnePlus 手机被节流温度OnePlus 13R 的散热效率很低,导致日常使用时机壳背面的表面温度很高。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中,高发热量导致其系统性能下降高达 65%。由于 骁龙 8 代 3的极端节流,在日常使用中很可能会出现负载下性能下降的情况。

Max. LoadIdle

45.7 °C45.6 °C44.5 °C 45.7 °C45.6 °C44.2 °C 44.8 °C43.8 °C44.1 °C

Maximum: 45.7 °CAverage: 44.9 °C

42.5 °C43.4 °C43 °C42.5 °C44.3 °C44.7 °C40.3 °C43.2 °C43 °C

Maximum: 44.7 °CAverage: 43 °C Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

29.3 °C29.4 °C29.5 °C 29.7 °C29.4 °C29 °C 29.2 °C29.2 °C29.2 °C

Maximum: 29.7 °CAverage: 29.3 °C

27.6 °C27.8 °C27.9 °C27.9 °C28.2 °C27.8 °C27.9 °C27.9 °C27 °C

Maximum: 28.2 °CAverage: 27.8 °C Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

78.7 % +100%Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

75.4 % +91%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

67.1 % +70%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

55.7 % +41%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

53.4 % +36%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

39.4 % Wild Life Extreme Stress TestXiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

67.4 % +80%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.8 % +78%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

62.8 % +67%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

53 % +41%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

51 % +36%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

37.5 % Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.5 % +89%Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

65.2 % +86%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

63.4 % +81%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

50.8 % +45%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

48.1 % +37%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

35.1 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityOnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

70.6 % Xiaomi 14TMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.8 % -5%Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

59.2 % -16%Honor 200 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

58.4 % -17%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

50.7 % -28%

OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)

发言人OnePlus 13R 的立体声扬声器能发出悦耳的声音,甚至还有一些低音。虽然中音相当均匀,但在我们的粉红噪声测量中,高音略有下降。如果您想从外部播放音乐,可以使用手机的有线 USB-C 端口。此外,还可以使用蓝牙 5.4。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)OnePlus 13R audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - OnePlus 13R 充电速度非常快OnePlus 13R 的电池阳极结合了硅和碳,因此容量高达 6,000 mAh(23.58 Wh)。该储能设备可通过手机的 USB-C 接口以高达 80 瓦的功率充电。与 OnePlus 13 相反,R 机型无法进行无线充电。在测试中,我们注意到使用 小米移动电源 25000.

在闲置模式下,它的功耗并不特别高效。OnePlus 13R 的耗电量超过 2 瓦,是我们最节俭的对比设备的两倍,例如 小米 14T.

耗电量

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.08 / 0.24 WattIdle 0.81 / 2.11 / 2.17 Watt

Load

9.2 / 11.12 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

OnePlus 13R6000 mAhXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G5000 mAhXiaomi 14T5000 mAhHonor 200 Pro5200 mAhSamsung Galaxy S24 FE4700 mAhOnePlus 136000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-3%23%-11%-2%1%10%15%Idle Minimum *0.811.11 -37%0.97 -20%1.11 -37%0.78 4%0.86 -6%0.929 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=20) -15%0.864 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years) -7%Idle Average *2.111.14 46%1.12 47%2.67 -27%1.31 38%1.74 18%1.374 ?(0.81 - 2.11, n=20) 35%1.428 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 32%Idle Maximum *2.171.16 47%1.19 45%2.75 -27%1.36 37%1.85 15%1.54 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=20) 29%1.589 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 27%Load Average *9.212.33 -34%4.13 55%8.13 12%13.23 -44%10.69 -16%8.82 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=19) 4%7.2 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=142, last 2 years) 22%Load Maximum *11.1215.34 -38%12.25 -10%8.64 22%16.23 -46%11.92 -7%11.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=19) -3%10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=142, last 2 years) 3%* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.58 (0.652-11.1) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4) OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.5-10.9) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3) OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75) Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

运行时间我们的实际电池测试是在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的,在 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款高端智能手机的电池提供了超过 25 小时的超长续航时间,而在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下,连续视频播放的续航时间也达到了 40.5 小时。因此,您可以使用这款手机 2 到 3 天而无需使用充电器。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

38h 18min

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 133)

25h 16min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

40h 28min

Load (maximum brightness)

3h 29min

OnePlus 13R6000 mAhXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G5000 mAhXiaomi 14T5000 mAhHonor 200 Pro5200 mAhSamsung Galaxy S24 FE4700 mAhOnePlus 136000 mAhBattery Runtime-25%-21%-34%-51%-0%Reader / Idle22981815 -21%2016 -12%2267 -1%H.2642428967 -60%1313 -46%2321 -4%WiFi v1.31516942 -38%1091 -28%993 -34%749 -51%1349 -11%Load209251 20%217 4%241 15%

Notebookcheck 总评分OnePlus 13R 的超强续航能力给人留下了深刻印象,但遗憾的是,这款高品质的高端手机无法承受骁龙 8 代 3 产生的废热。

Back to the verdict

OnePlus 13R

- 03/06/2025 v8

Marcus Herbrich

Chassis88%

Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device92%

Connectivity52 / 69 → 75%

Weight88%

Battery94%

Display92%

Games Performance30 / 55 → 54%

Application Performance66 / 85 → 78%

AI Performance15%

Temperature84%

Noise100%

Audio83 / 90 → 92%

Camera78%

Average63%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging25%Power Use96.3%Repairability20%Software Updates89% Total Sustainability Score: 42.6%

More articles related to this deviceOnePlus 13R (13 Series)News•OnePlus 13:公司确认更新支持时限并推出磁性充电器 |Review•OnePlus 13 智能手机评测:让电池革命开始吧 |News•骁龙 8 精英版性能有缺陷?关于 OnePlus 13 的评论 |News•相机测试:在 OnePlus 13、Oppo Find X8 Pro 和 Vivo X200 Pro 的对比中明显胜出 |News•OnePlus 13 开箱视频确认了发布前的显示屏和设计变化

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 600859 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!